Tuesday, April 28, 2020
Paper on Importance of Art Essays - Articles, Arts, Culture
Griggs Edward Humanities 004 June 12, 2019 ART (Humanities Paper #2) Both art and society have come a long way from how things used to be. Society has become more accepting, critical, and appreciative of art. I believe this is the result of the cultural and societal changes art has been directly responsible for. Art has different significance to people depending on their values, weather it'd be religious, political, or socially historic meaning. Today in this day and age we face a problem of how art is valued. Capitalism has had a significant impact on art and its creators. Money and society for the longest time has been at the forefront of new ideologies and what we can consider calling "accepted art." Furthermore, we need to question and become critical of what is "art" is placed in museums, and how we go about doing it, for future generations to learn about. Take a trip to any contemporary art gallery/exhibition in the world and you might be shocked but probably unlikely you will be shocked. What will you see? You will see flashy, vivid, BIG, and visually enticing art. Images, video, photographs, and appropriated pop culture images. What you will rarely find is a thorough discussion of what is being presented. This is part of the unique phenomenon of contemporary art. The art and presentation of the art have merged into a nebulous space that resists clarity of some sort of explanation and understanding. The reason for this lack is in relation to the very ideas behind contemporary art, but as the role of a museum is to clarify and educate, it is even more crucial that museums and galleries are very careful in how they present art in a way that interrogates and examines what is being produced. Art is becoming saturated and perverted by new occurring ideologies stemming from different cultures and facets of society. Ideologies are not bad per say, the negative part is how art is being affected by it. What criteria are we going off of in order to deem certain art, "accepted art?" According to ideology, such exceptions would be so-called great' works because it is through our highest ideals that ideology ties us to the values of the existing social relations. We are in a time where social, political, and cultural movements are forcing art to move with these changes. I believe it is imperative we focus on art in its purest organic form itself, rather than always try implementing meaning to it, or force the idea of a certain ideology onto it. On the contrary, art that remains aloof from the material world (of politics, the military etc) is far more functional because it shows us who we ideally are, not what we actually do. This is the role of ideology. It is by over-shooting reality and representing our very highest ideals that ideology manages to serve those in power. There are those in society which describe this glorification of ideologies as, false consciousness' is that it secures the existing social relations in processes of socialization and social reproduction. But it achieves this by promoting fine feelings and deeply held beliefs. Art is at its most ideological, then, not when it is politically instrumentalized but when it is autonomous, presenting an image of ourselves as cultivated, disinterested and high-minded. The last 50 years have been crucial to art. Contributions made to the study of art and creation of art have had significant impacts on the world in the last 50 years. Every form of art has grown and evolved into what we have today. We can thank the Feminist and Civil Rights movements for making our art world massively more inclusive. The dematerialization of the object of art and its expansion into idea or phenomenon have made it possible for a text, an action or an environment to be understood as art and for Modernist realism to continue by other means. Art is in the 60's influenced the end of wars and violence, triggered social movements and brought people together in harmony. Artists like Pablo Picasso, and Andy Warhol challenged the societal norms of what can be considered or called art. Musicians such as Bob Dylan
Thursday, March 19, 2020
Free Essays on Breaching The Dams, A Controversial Solution To Saving Salmon
Breaching Dams - A Controversial Solution To Saving The Salmon TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................................ 1 The Army Corps of Engineers Role..................... 2 The National Marine Fisheries Services Recommendations.. 2 Proponents Of Breaching............................. 3 Technical Requirements And Cost Of Breaching.......... 4 Opponents Of Breaching............................. 5 Conclusion........................................ 5 Bibliography....................................... 6 BREACHING DAMS - A CONTROVERSIAL SOLUTION TO SAVING THE SALMON Introduction A big controversy in Washington today is whether we should breach our dams to save our salmon. Opponents are squaring off over a controversial proposal to save salmon by breaching four dams on Washingtonââ¬â¢s Snake River. Each spring, millions of young Chinook salmon in the Snake River have to get past four killers as they make their way out to the open sea. They go by the names of Lower Granite, Little Goose, Lower Monumental, and Ice Harbor. These dams, erected in Washington in the 1960s and 1970s to generate power for the Pacific Northwest, can be just as deadly as any predator, smolts can get pureed by turbine blades or plunge over spillways to their deaths. Survivors are delayed by sluggish water behind the dams that might cripple their ability to adapt to salt water. The Army Corps Of Engineers Role The Army Corps of Engineers, which is supposed to run the dams while protecting the salmon, has spent years and hundreds of millions of dollars to try to reduce the annual slaughter by capturing smolts and trucking or barging them to the Columbia River, upstream of Portland, where the fish have a chance to get to the Pacific Ocean. This strategy is failing, experts say. According to tagged fish studies, less than five percent of the barged salmon survive to return to their spawning grou... Free Essays on Breaching The Dams, A Controversial Solution To Saving Salmon Free Essays on Breaching The Dams, A Controversial Solution To Saving Salmon Breaching Dams - A Controversial Solution To Saving The Salmon TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................................ 1 The Army Corps of Engineers Role..................... 2 The National Marine Fisheries Services Recommendations.. 2 Proponents Of Breaching............................. 3 Technical Requirements And Cost Of Breaching.......... 4 Opponents Of Breaching............................. 5 Conclusion........................................ 5 Bibliography....................................... 6 BREACHING DAMS - A CONTROVERSIAL SOLUTION TO SAVING THE SALMON Introduction A big controversy in Washington today is whether we should breach our dams to save our salmon. Opponents are squaring off over a controversial proposal to save salmon by breaching four dams on Washingtonââ¬â¢s Snake River. Each spring, millions of young Chinook salmon in the Snake River have to get past four killers as they make their way out to the open sea. They go by the names of Lower Granite, Little Goose, Lower Monumental, and Ice Harbor. These dams, erected in Washington in the 1960s and 1970s to generate power for the Pacific Northwest, can be just as deadly as any predator, smolts can get pureed by turbine blades or plunge over spillways to their deaths. Survivors are delayed by sluggish water behind the dams that might cripple their ability to adapt to salt water. The Army Corps Of Engineers Role The Army Corps of Engineers, which is supposed to run the dams while protecting the salmon, has spent years and hundreds of millions of dollars to try to reduce the annual slaughter by capturing smolts and trucking or barging them to the Columbia River, upstream of Portland, where the fish have a chance to get to the Pacific Ocean. This strategy is failing, experts say. According to tagged fish studies, less than five percent of the barged salmon survive to return to their spawning grou...
Tuesday, March 3, 2020
Faire les quatre cents coups - French Expression
Faire les quatre cents coups - French Expression Expression: Faire les quatre cents coups Pronunciation: [fehr lay kat(reu) sa(n) coo] Meaning: to raise hell, live a wild life, sow ones wild oats Literal translation: to do the four hundred tricks Register: normal Notes Many expressions cant be translated literally between French and English, but the French expression faire les quatre cents coups is one that makes virtually no sense at all- you cant even guess as to what it means figuratively. It may be partly the definite article les (the) that makes it so difficult, as if there are 400 specific tricks that one must do in order to claim that youve lived a truly wild life. Also, the word coup has numerous meanings- in faire les quatre cents coups, its in the sense of un mauvais coup i.e. a dirty or mean trick. Unfortunately, the title of the Franà §ois Truffauts film Les Quatre Cents Coups was poorly translated as The 400 Blows in English. 400 Tricks would have been a little better, but the best translation would have probably been something more figuratively comparable like Raising Hell or The Wild One. Example à à à Paul ne va pas luniversità ©; il fait toujours les quatre cents coups. à à à Paul isnt going to college; hes still sowing his wild oats.
Sunday, February 16, 2020
'radical change Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words
'radical change - Essay Example On the other hand, in the development process, a large organisation may come face-to-face with momentous need for radical and fundamental change. In most instances, changes in a large organisation may be triggered by several circumstances that include: emerging threat from a competitor, decision to expand the companyââ¬â¢s market, unexpected reduction in the companyââ¬â¢s production and profitability, change in customersââ¬â¢ needs and demands as well as sharp slide in the companyââ¬â¢s production (Pardo Del Val and Fuentes 2003, p.149). Therefore, to ensure the success of any radical change in an organisation, leader and managers ought to come up with a promising and an effective mechanism to facilitate effective implementation of the required change. Additionally, the adoption of a strategy that would incorporate ideas and views from all stakeholders is also essential and critical for the companyââ¬â¢s development (Thornhill, Lewis, Millmore, and Saunders 2000, p.11) . The essay below will as a result identify and expound on the most effective means of addressing the financial crises in Associated Dairies & Farm Stores Limited
Sunday, February 2, 2020
Curriculum Based Assessment Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words
Curriculum Based Assessment - Research Paper Example The research sought to establish the possibility of developing a formative assessment system. Teachers could use this system to grow their effectiveness in teaching learners with academic disabilities. Eventually, a comparative study showed that teachers were more effective on using this formative model. In this regard, the validity criteria and conventional credibility in writings, expressions, and spellings were emphasized. There were three key questions addressed in creating a curriculum based assessment procedures. This included the mode of structuring the activities of evaluation in order to produce adequate data, the parameters of measuring the results, and the possibility of using the data to grow educational programs (Stecker & Fuchs, 2000, P.130). These questions were answered using a systematic evaluation of three major issues relevant to each of the measures. The logistical feasibility of the measures and treatment of utility or validity of the measures were technically ev aluated. The procedures for developing the assessment have been specified and will be briefly discussed. Definition Curriculum is the content that is organized for delivery to students. It is done with respect to sequence and scope of methods and materials by intended learning results (Lemons et al, 2013, p.450). Curriculum based assessment is a term that is used to refer to school based assessment that evaluates student performance in accordance to what is being taught. Curriculum based test measures the functioning of student in relation to knowledge and skills as outlined in the curriculum. It is noteworthy that the curriculum-based measurement measures the progress and competency of a student in the basic areas of skill such as... This essay approves that curriculum based assessment is an approach to measuring the educational growth of each student. The main objective of the curriculum-based assessment is to assist teachers in testing the effectiveness of the lessons offer to individual students. Curriculum based assessment has both advantages and disadvantages. They are efficient and economical in that most of the important characteristics that are used in developing curriculum based measurement procedures are within the context of the ongoing instructions. This report makes a conclusion that the results of CBM research have provided a ground for developing standardized procedures of measurement used to evaluate the effects of modifying the studentsââ¬â¢ instructional program. A research on the studentââ¬â¢s achievement effects on teachers of special education using these procedures proved that the effectiveness of instruction could be improved by the use of CBM in formative evaluation. The assessment of CBM focuses mainly on reading and math as a basic skill. The broad focus is on the measurement areas, basic skills, behavior and others. The basic skills of reading, spelling, math, written expression and critical thinking skills are assessed. Curriculum based assessment procedures focus majorly on special education planning and development. It is evident that response to intervention is nowadays common. This improves teaching and learning with regard to the effective component of RTI that requires particular attention from admini strators.
Saturday, January 25, 2020
Organizational Leadership: The Journey
Organizational Leadership: The Journey Before I started writing this paper I put a lot of thought into leadership and what it really meant. I took this graduate level class for personal and professional development. Over the weeks I feel that the premise of this course was that leaders could be developed. A common belief that is perceived by many is that leaders are born and not made. As I have grown in my career it is becoming more obvious that effectiveness as a leader depends less on some naturally born trait and much more on developing learned principles that we can follow. Leadership is a term that has multiple meanings. What is implied in defining leadership is that it is a never ending journey for anyone who wants to motivate and inspire people. Leadership is defined as: the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or set of goals. (Robbins and Judge, 2009). Leadership is often considered the most important factor in determining organizational success due to the importance of guiding employees towards a common organizational goal. Despite the development of several theories and models the acceptance of one single theory that totally clarifies the implementation and performance of effective leadership has not been universally adopted. We should consider leadership theories and individually evaluate the contributing factors of each to effective leadership within our organization and environment. Early leadership theories were developed under the contingency model which considers how situational factors alter the effectiveness of particular leaderà ¢Ã ¢Ã¢â¬Å¡Ã ¬Ã ¢Ã¢â¬Å¾Ã ¢s behavior and style of leadership. The most recognized theory is Fiedlers contingency theory. This theory contrasts situational influence and leader traits / effectiveness through a scale known as the Least Preferred Co-Worker Scale (LPC). After the development of contingency theory we learned from Robbins Judge of a more modern theory of transformational leadership. Transformational leadership is concerned with processes that change and transform individuals and organizations. The shared process between leaders and followers is determined by the leaders ability to produce emotional intelligence and stimulate the higher collection of employee needs. It is through this ability that leaders acquire trust, admiration, loyalty and respect from their followers, therefore motivating them to accomplish more than what is expected. The fundamental nature of transformational leadership is empowering followers and developing them to reach their full potential. Transformational and transactional leadership tends to co-exist rather than be mutually exclusive. The best leaders combine both to produce performance in an organization to the next level. Some personality traits lead people naturally into leadership roles; this is considered the trait theory. A crisis or important event may cause a person to rise to the occasion which brings out extraordinary leadership qualities in an ordinary person. This is referred to the great event theory. People can choose to become leaders by learning leadership skills and promoting a higher visionary perspective with transformational leadership. Leadership Interviews Leader Interview #1 (A): John Adams, Chief Operating Officer of Advanced Systems Design Peer Interview #2 (B): Samantha Cobb, Call Center Manager Question 1: What is your definition of leadership? A. I believe leadership is defined by a vision. I feel leadership and management are different. A leader needs to introduce the organizations values and to promote a long term vision. Their values should be focused towards the employees with a goal to lead by setting an example. B. A strong leader should be seen as someone people see as available, approachable, and fosters trust. They must support their employees and providing direction. Question 2: What is your viewpoint on leadership? A. Leadership is made up of several core values. These include having a vision for your team, the desire to learn and grow, being accessible and unbiased are important keys to effectively transform an organization. There are many variables to my perspective on leadership, however there are certain leadership principles and qualities that are very important and primarily where I focus. B. My viewpoint is that leadership is collaborative, we must all work together to achieve the shared goals of the company. I also want to contribute to each employeeà ¢Ã ¢Ã¢â¬Å¡Ã ¬Ã ¢Ã¢â¬Å¾Ã ¢s learning process and successes. A leader must inspire their team. Question 3: What is your leadership style? A. My style is to take the goals and objectives of the business and align my team to work together to meet those targets. I define the vision. I do not follow a rigid style or framework. There needs to be flexibility within the group to change and adapt as needed. My style flows down to how we incorporate our delivery of services and interact with clients. B. I see myself as more of an informal leader. I do not seek to control my employees and I purposely step back to allow people to do their job and learn. I believe in giving my employees or team members as many opportunities as possible. I am extremely good at delegating tasks and encourage independence. I have found people work better when they are given freedom. I am adamant about employees being open and honest. If there has been a mistake, let it be known. I feel my employees are comfortable in approaching me as needed. Question 4: What are the strengths of your leadership style? A. Because my style is flexible, people tend to feel comfortable coming to me. I do my best to be personable while still maintaining a professional standpoint within the organization. I believe that my employees and team members work with me in a collaborative mission. B. In my experience, people do not want to be controlled. They fail under constant scrutiny and pressure. Too much control fosters a negative atmosphere. My casual leadership style has always been successful. Question 5: What hinders effective leadership? A. Lack of credibility will destroy a persons ability to be an effective leader. When the teams trust is broken, the leader will have to work extremely hard to return to their position. Inflexibility can destroy the leaderà ¢Ã ¢Ã¢â¬Å¡Ã ¬Ã ¢Ã¢â¬Å¾Ã ¢s relationship with the team. There needs to be a consistent flow of new ideas, leaders must take advantage of opportunities, and explore ways to invoke continuous transformation. B. A leader who cannot communicate effectively will fail in their role. Without communication, leadership does not exist. A leader can have great ideas but unless they are shared within the organization then they are just thoughts. Leadership is also destroyed by a negative attitude and isolation. Personal Reflection Synopsis of Interviews Question 1: What is your definition of leadership? The individuals were aware of how leadership impacted their organizations. Each used leadership as a motivating factor in providing guidance to their respective employees. Question 2: What is your viewpoint on leadership? Leaders need to posses an authentic reflection about their personal leadership approach. To effectively share their leadership viewpoint they need to share their vision and communicate this with employees so that the philosophy fundamentals permeate within the organization. Both interviews discuss the priority of teamwork and the importance of reflection or self actualization. Question 3: What is your leadership style? Leaders with a transformational style emphasis vision, flexibility, and adaptability. Leaders operate at different levels of the organization which reflects on their leadership style and organizational perspective. Question 4: What are the strengths of your leadership style? Structure and consideration are two approaches that measure strengths in specific leadership styles. Leaders are concerned about the needs of their employees. They assist employees with problems and provide guidance. Question 5: What hinders effective leadership? Leaders need to have traits that are respected like trust and credibility. They also need to be positive, communicative, and flexible so that they are open to new ideas. Leadership and Self Assessment à ¢Ã ¢Ã¢â¬Å¡Ã ¬ Peer Focused In my initial personal assessment on leadership style and potential, I assessed myself with three peer co-workers. Their feedback was somewhat inline with my own personal self reflection with my leadership abilities. Some of the feedback that I received was that I tend to be more of a manager than a leader in my current position. As a manager I spend a lot of time focusing on planning and resource allocations for specific projects, thus more transactional. To further develop my leadership I need to take a step back and look at creating a compelling vision for the future, utilize my influence in the organization, and developing strategies for producing the changes needed to achieve that vision (more transformational). In my peer discussions on leadership delivery, I tend to use a more autocratic style. What I need to strive for is a more democratic style where I delegate responsibility to others, and encourage more group participation so that I can push my influence down further within the employee ranks. Reflecting on my leadership style it is important to recognize that a universal leadership style cannot be used with all employees. A leader must look at the specific relationship between a leader and each individual employee. I recognized that a leader with a single/universally applied leadership style is inefficient and unsuccessful. In Robbins and Judge the authors allude to many situations where a combination of theories would be the preferred leadership style. For example transactional and transformational worked best when they were combined as a leadership approach. A leader is far more effective if they are a flexible leader who has the capability to use different approaches with each employee depending on different conditions. A good leader helps employees understand the larger perspective in which they are operating within the organization. The relationship the leader has with employees will determine how effective the leader will become in influencing organizational transfo rmation.
Friday, January 17, 2020
Caribbean Slavery Essay
Slaves were people captured in war, used to settle a debt, or made slaves as a means of punishment. The Spaniards in the Caribbean had little need for African slaves in the early 1500s for various reasons. The Treaty of Tordesillas, which was a line of demarcation drawn north to south, west of the Azores and Cape Verdeââ¬â¢s, stipulated that the areas west of the line belonged to the Spaniards and the east to the Portuguese. As a result of the treaty Africa was on Portugalââ¬â¢s side of the line, so in order for Spaniards to obtain African slaves they had to go through the Portuguese. During the period of the early 1500s the Treaty of Tordesillas resulted in the Portuguese being the first nation that the Spaniards granted an asiento. This was granted in 1515. These special licenses, asientos, only allowed a specific number of slaves into a diverse number of countries and limited the need for African slaves. The cost to ship slaves from West Africa to Portugal and Spain and then to the Americas proved prohibitive. There was easier access to Taino labour and it was unnecessary to spend extra money on importing slaves. Tainos were used to find and mine the gold because they were familiar with the surroundings and there were enough Tainos to mine the little gold the Spaniards had found. Indentured servants or white servants also contributed to the need for only a small number of African slaves in the 1500s. Indentured servants (contracted workers; poor people from Europe) started to migrate to the Caribbean from Europe, as the Caribbean were advertised as having prospects of a new life and jobs. Their contracts usually lasted four to five years. The islands that were found in the Caribbean needed to be developed in order to make them suitable for living. The Spaniards offered property as an incentive to attract people who would develop the islands and settle there. This was how indentured servants were coaxed into migrating. Eventually however, the Amerindians and white servants were no longer a sufficient labour force. B. The Amerindians were not used to the working conditions and thus died. Also, Old World diseases such as measles, diphtheria, typhus, cholera, scarlet fever, chicken pox, yellow fever, whooping cough, smallpox, influenza and gonorrhea affected them while some died from depression. Indentured servants were unskilled in cultivation and unwilling to work. They were unaccustomed to the conditions of the Caribbean and succumbed to various New World diseases such as syphilis and yellow fever. Africans worked harder, survived the conditions of the Caribbean better (similar conditions existed in Africa), knew how to plant tropical plants, and were more resistant to Old World diseases. They were also less costly than indentured servants and there was a more constant supply of African slaves than indentured servants. The trade winds which blew from east to west made coming to the Caribbean from Africa very easy. That is in comparison to traveling from Europe to the Caribbean which was difficult as the trade winds worked against sailing ships. Also ships had a longer distance to cover when they sailed to the Caribbean from Europe. African slaves were their masterââ¬â¢s property. Masters could do whatever they pleased with the African slaves as they paid for them and they were their property. Offspring produced by said slaves was also their masterââ¬â¢s property. This added to the reliability of African slaves as there would always be another generation to enslave. Indentured servants could easily escape as they had the same appearances, knew the culture and language and therefore could easily blend into the crowd and disappear with the influx of people coming and leaving the Caribbean islands. Africans could not do this because of their colour and it would be difficult for them to escape. This added to the appeal of using African slaves. Plantation owners became greedy and no longer wanted to give or offer their sugar lands so as to attract indentured servants to come to the Caribbean. The plantation owners saw the Africans as a commodity therefore did not have to give any incentive to attract them because they were their property and enslaved to them. For these reasons the Africans were seen as a perfect source of labour. Increased work resulted in increased productivity, which increased the wealth of the Spaniards. C. By the 1600s and 1700s African slaves became more popular in the Caribbean. Amerindians had died out by the 1500ââ¬â¢s due to diseases, overwork and ill-treatment. Indentured servants had lost fervour in coming to the Caribbean as it was costly to travel and the chances of surviving the tropical conditions were slim. Some ran away, breaking their contract, to become Buccaneers. The decline in the number of available indentured servants and Tainos, and the growth of the colonies increased the need for labour. Sugar had become very popular and was in demand on the European market. The wealth that sugar brought was recognized and more land as cultivated for sugar production. The sugar revolution had begun and the Dutch saw an opportunity to sell slaves in the Caribbean as there was a rise in labour needs. The Dutch were granted an asiento in 1667, by this time Dutch trading in African slaves became very popular. Additionally, slaves were severely abused and thus many died. The rapid demise of slaves from the harsh conditions resulted in a constant need and t his also added to the ââ¬Å"great extension of African slavery in the rest of the Caribbean in the 1600s and 1700sâ⬠.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)